//
you're reading...
The Straits Times

Hard To Ascertain Social Media Influence In Politics

Globally, social media has transformed government-citizen and politician-voter interaction, and it is here to stay” (Social Media’s Influence In Singapore Politics Here To Stay, Carol Soon).

Taken from http://www.techncom.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/social-media-keyboard-button.jpg.

And it is hard to evaluate their implications on governance if our politicians do not go beyond manicured statements on events or somewhat superficial posts of their day-to-day undertakings.

Social media may have increased propinquity between politicians and their constituents – heightening that sense of nearness and immediacy – but that does not necessarily guarantee “dialogic communication” or a “cooperative and communicative relationship” (ST, Jun. 20). After all, such phenomena seem more applicable for personal interactions, not parliamentarians with a large following. More broadly speaking, it is hard to ascertain the influence of social media in politics, and even harder to determine whether social media engagement has tangible impact: to “legitimise government decisions, promote a co-sharing of the ownership for shaping policies, [or] increase citizen trust”. Neither have they been able to “navigate online clutter and make sense of the information and signals they are sent”.

I enjoy the occasional social media post from our ministers or members of parliament, as I do when I scroll through most Facebook timelines or Twitter feeds. Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong snaps nice photographs on his excursions around Singapore. The “A Day in the Life of a Minister” video featuring Foreign Affairs and Law Minister K. Shanmugam offered a unique glimpse into his exhausting daily routine. Most politicians – including those in the opposition parties – are also eager to share interactions with residents or their grassroots work, to show their connections to the people.

Yet in these ubiquitous updates thoughtful discourse is rare. And it is hard to evaluate their implications on governance if our politicians do not go beyond manicured statements on events or somewhat superficial posts of their day-to-day undertakings. In the first place – as difficult as it may be, with the sheer volume of comments or “likes” or “retweets” – it is not clear whether the aggregated perspectives guide policy decisions. In the event such feedback is actually used, thoughtful observers have pointed to the proliferation of “echo chambers”, wherein like-minded individuals congregate to reaffirm their own perceptions.

In this vein, the positive assessment of social media may be a tad optimistic.

It might make more sense to describe social media as a prerequisite for our politicians, and how they use it beyond the cosmetic posts of their roles and responsibilities remains up in the air. The tangible influence of social media in politics will only be evident if they dabble in meaningful socio-economic commentary, if they use the many responses they receive online, and – even more interestingly – if they engage in spaces beyond  their spheres of influence. The Internet brims with diversity, which has yet to feature in Singapore.

A version of this article was published in The Straits Times.

Advertisements

About guanyinmiao

A man of knowledge lives by acting, not by thinking about acting. Carlos Castaneda.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow guanyinmiao's musings on WordPress.com

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,215 other followers

Twitter

%d bloggers like this: