//
you're reading...
Today

Geopolitics From The Armchair

Israel is the first line of defence against terror. In the long term, its neighbours must learn to live in peace with it” (Israel’s Neighbours Must Learn To Live In Peace With It, Tan Kia Lee).

As well-intentioned as his letter might be (TODAY, Jan. 14), Mr. Tan’s blinkered thesis – that “Israel’s neighbours must learn to live in peace with it – ignores realities surrounding the tensions which have persisted for decades, perhaps even centuries.

According to Mr. Tan Israel’s neighbours have launched terrorist attacks on its territory, yet in the same vein there is no mention of Israel’s wanton acts of aggression, and the many human rights transgressions it could be guilty of. Moreover without international consensus on what constitutes terrorism Zionist paramilitary groups such as the Irgun and the Stern Gang which fought for the independence of the country in the 1940s – involved in bombings and assassinations – were in fact considered to be terrorist organisations, including Britain.

In his anxiety to pin blame on Israel’s neighbours, Mr. Tan forgets the country’s own complicity in the cycle of violence. What about the Jewish settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem? What about the rights of the Palestinians to self-determination, and claims of Israeli authoritarianism through seizures, checkpoints, and separation fences? What do we make of the cycle of violence?

The security of Israelis is no less important, but attempts at overtures – if at all possible – should not be about approportioning blame, finding fault with the parties, or asserting who has to learn to live in peace with who.

And above all Mr. Tan underestimates the complexity of geopolitical dynamics. The United Nations – representative of diverse voices but dominated in its Security Council by superpowers with vested interests – is, more often than not, hapless. To date there are disagreements over the Palestinian refugees and their right to return, security and demilitarisation, defining the territories, borders, and the status of Jerusalem, as well as the political pressure and international support. The conclusion that “Israel is the first line of defence against terror” can be a tad disingenuous.

There is some hypocrisy as I pen this response from my armchair, though I do not profess to offer a panacea. At a comfortable distance – away from the socio-economic hardships or the threats of rocket fire in the Middle East – our opinions on these affairs are cheap. So the least we can probably do is to be fair in our assessments, and to not jump into conclusions so carelessly.

A version of this article was published in TODAY.

Advertisements

About guanyinmiao

A man of knowledge lives by acting, not by thinking about acting. Carlos Castaneda.

Discussion

One thought on “Geopolitics From The Armchair

  1. “…..ignores realities surrounding the tensions which have persisted for decades, perhaps even centuries”

    That is wrong sentence. This started during after WWII. Prior to this, jews were leaving “comfortably” amongst its Arab neighbours, in and out of palestine.

    Posted by Fahtulrazi | January 15, 2015, 8:22 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow guanyinmiao's musings on WordPress.com

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,150 other followers

Twitter

%d bloggers like this: