you're reading...

Petitioning In Vain

Two online petitions in circulation: one against citizen journalism site STOMP and the other against socio-commentary site The Real Singapore (TRS). The first claims that STOMP has fabricated stories, promoted cyber-bullying, and invaded the privacy of fellow citizens, whereas the second asserts that TRS has posted articles inciting fear, hatred, and xenophobia, many of which have been plagiarised. Both are perceived as scourges of the Internet.

Nothing is going to come out of these petitions, besides the publicity which both websites will be grateful for. For every detractor both STOMP and TRS justify their publications with large supporter bases. The Singapore Press Holdings has responded that STOMP will continue. Pragmatically the 25,000 signatures on the petition count for very little, given that the website drew 120 million page views and had 1.68 million unique visitors. And even if these websites are eventually forced by the government to close down their users will just swarm to alternatives, or continue to post drivel through personal social media platforms. Petitions calling for the closure of those sites will then emerge again.

Besides, it will be difficult for the government to justify further regulatory action against websites. What norms should it operate on? How does it determine if there have been breaches of public interest? Already the practicality of the ban on 100 websites has been questioned, and the individual licensing scheme introduced by the Media Development Agency in June last year was criticised for the lack of specificity over the criteria used. The conservatism of a majority of the population was used to justify the ban on Ashley Madison

Petitioning for the closure of websites is not the answer.

Forcing a website to close down is easy for the government. Yet this present anxiety to shut down websites could also blind us to deeper dissatisfaction with national policies.

Forcing a website to close down is easy for the government. Yet this present anxiety to shut down websites could also blind us to deeper dissatisfaction with national policies.

Bad content hurts a website. Bad content is hate speech, misinformation and disinformation, as well as corrosive discourse. High web traffic and the allure of sensationalism drive content providers to lower editorial standards and publish the most ludicrous pieces at no cost – at least, for the time being. In the long term growing scepticism of the veracity and quality of content will drive readers away from the websites. The aforementioned petitions may not be effective responses, but they are evidence of disgruntlement towards these content platforms.

Forcing a website to close down is easy for the government. Yet this present anxiety to shut down websites could also blind us to deeper dissatisfaction with national policies. Someone ranting against immigration policies could have lost a job. Someone criticising the education system could have struggled through school. Someone rambling about income inequality could be finding it hard to make ends meet. These cannot be discounted. I am not endorsing their actions, even though echo chambers like TRS do possess some value in this regard.

An odd proposition it may appear to be, but I support STOMP’s and TRS’s rights to exist. This is premised upon the faith that Singaporeans will grow to be more discerning readers.

Perhaps the most convincing justification for the closure of such websites is the direct harm caused to individuals. Witch hunts have troubled innocents, and social media faux pas are usually followed by incessant harassment, and after corrections have been made the damage is often already done. In such instances the importance of prevention and deterrence cannot be disregarded. The illegal reproduction of posts ranks close to these considerations too.

It would however be naïve to think that these unfortunate incidents are the result of the Internet, even if the medium does perpetuate them. In real life we might be less likely to make disparaging remarks or spout nasty things, but sometimes we remain quick to cast aspersions or castigate others for their shortcomings. I am guilty too, for my cynicism clouds my perceptions and interactions with others. The proposals for education and media literacy programmes may be clichéd, yet they are reasonably the most sustainable solutions. Learning about the consumption of content and ascertaining facts are crucial, although learning how to unplug or disengage from (potential) conflicts is equally significant.

Above all we should educate our kids and ourselves to be respectful, to be kind to one another. To treat others the way you would like to be treated – online and offline.

About guanyinmiao

A man of knowledge lives by acting, not by thinking about acting. Carlos Castaneda.


7 thoughts on “Petitioning In Vain

  1. I think it depends very much on the purpose of these petitions. Is it simply to encourage a cause of action, i.e. to close down TRS / STOMP?

    It is naivety on the part of the petition creator if he really thinks those sites would be shut because of his petition; yet we cannot discount the fact that petitions like this give people the opportunity to gather, and by gathering you will know how many people in the population actively share your thoughts. Those who signed the petition can thus rest easy knowing that they are not the only ones who feel a certain way.

    Anw, I’m unsure if you’re aware, but in the UK they run a thing called e-Petitions. People can create / sign petitions and if your petition reaches 100,000 signatures, your issue could be debated in parliament. (*Could be = no guarantee that it will be. Debated = no guarantee that rules will be changed).

    Just like the petition to shut down STOMP, there is no guarantee that STOMP *will* be shut down. But I like that idea ‘cuz it encourages active citizenry and it gives the govt a better sense of ground sentiments and address concerns via civil means vs. riots / protests etc. Can the same idea be adopted in Sg? Hm.

    Posted by vincent wong | April 21, 2014, 8:18 am
    • Yup there’s something similar in the US also: We the People. Basically along the lines of the UK parallel (which I was not cognisant of). If I am not mistaken the US version requires citizens to sign in with their real names or social security numbers. The prevailing concern – also raised during this petition against STOMP, and during the hijab movement last year – is that many of the signatures may be falsified, that the petition is astroturfed. At this moment I don’t think it’s a fair defence to disregard the concerns of petitioners, though it is valid.

      Petitioning is a form of political action. So generally speaking there is value in the exercise, as you’ve pointed out, to “encourage active citizenry” and “give the government a better sense of ground sentiments”. It will be curiously ironic if participants of the petitions felt that “they were not the only ones who felt a certain way” – a sense of fellow-feeling – because I’d reckon that many of the people who frequent TRS and STOMP treat those channels as echo chambers, that they are not alone in their way of thinking. I did concede in the post that while both petitions are not the best responses to TRS and STOMP, they are indications of disgruntlement against the platforms in question.

      tl;dr: It is hard to ascertain the intent of the authors of the petitions, and while they have some value in terms of (possibly) aggregating ground sentiments in this instance – concerning TRS and STOMP – I think they’ll do little this time round.

      Jin Yao

      Posted by guanyinmiao | April 21, 2014, 3:55 pm


  1. Pingback: Heart Truths | guanyinmiao's musings - May 19, 2014

  2. Pingback: Legitimising Petitions | guanyinmiao's musings - July 23, 2014

  3. Pingback: Old Points About New Media | guanyinmiao's musings - September 1, 2014

  4. Pingback: Creating New(s) Niches For Socio-Political Discourse | guanyinmiao's musings - September 3, 2014

  5. Pingback: Hit Fake News Sites Where It Hurts | guanyinmiao's musings - November 29, 2016

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


%d bloggers like this: