//
you're reading...
Today

An Exercise In Futility

A proposed anti-harassment Bill that will be tabled in Parliament on Monday is likely to deter extreme forms of behaviour in cyberspace, such as the lynch mob mentality, but the jury is still out as to whether it can effectively enforced if passed” (‘Not Easy’ To Enforce Proposed Anti-Harassment Law, Mr. Amir Hussain).

I must be the only one who reckons that the proposed anti-harassment Bill that will be tabled in Parliament later – to curb cyberbullying and other extreme misbehaviour on the Internet – is an exercise in futility. Practically, it would be near-impossible for the authorities to trace sources, to identify and apprehend anonymous individuals who have broken the law. How do you pin down the originator? Consequently pragmatically, the supposed signal of deterrence will lose its effect, especially when a derogatory post goes viral on social media channels. And even if the perpetrators are eventually nabbed, the damage would have been done.

As criminal defence lawyer Josephus Tan told TODAY, “How much are we willing to spend to set up such a massive infrastructure … to monitor and track the various social media platforms on a 24/7 basis?” Furthermore there is greater uncertainty when one considers the varying degrees of harm and damage. Would my-feelings-were-hurt be considered a legitimate claim? How does one decide if a victim has been genuinely affected by comments?

And if there is truly a lynch mob, who will be held accountable? Everyone involved?

In past instances level-headed Singaporeans have rallied against the racist comments of the fictitious “Heather Chua”, and many were quick to condemn others who had launched unnecessary tirades against the family members of Briton Anton Casey.

Some might contend that courts will develop norms to test the reasonableness of claims and to protect the victims, yet these norms can emerge and evolve collectively without legal intervention; in fact in past instances level-headed Singaporeans have rallied against the racist comments of the fictitious “Heather Chua”, and many were quick to condemn others who had launched unnecessary tirades against the family members of Briton Anton Casey. Associate Professor Eugene Tan (TODAY, Mar. 1) believes that “the law will catalyse the development and growth of appropriate online conduct”, though it would appear that such an informal code is in place: to be kind, respectful, and to hold truth and veracity sacred.

It may be a slow process, but the online community has been heading in the right direction for some time.

Moreover it is also a shame that the Bill has been tabled before a large-scale study on the purported effects of cyberbullying and cyber-addiction on teenagers from the Singapore Children’s Society, the Institute of Mental Health, and the National Institute of Education has concluded. One would assume that the perspectives of 3,000 young Singaporeans would give the government a better picture, and how educators have been managing such conflicts.

Will the Bill reduce the number of abusive and hateful netizens on the Internet? Marginally, perhaps. But all these perpetual discussions about round-the-clock surveillance, investigations and prosecution, as well as punitive and retributive measures have overshadowed the need for strong education and media literacy programmes in the long-term. Legislation at the moment is akin to a reactive Band-Aid. Even as we accept that hate and intolerance can never be eradicated anywhere, we can try to reduce their display sensibly.

A version of this article was published in TODAY.

Advertisements

About guanyinmiao

A man of knowledge lives by acting, not by thinking about acting. Carlos Castaneda.

Discussion

3 thoughts on “An Exercise In Futility

  1. Great article. My viewpoint is thiat the phenomena of cyber bullying and lynch mobbing is a sign of some more fundamental cause or root. This cause can be behavioral habits under anonymity, online circlejerk culture, or even just general wide scale nastiness. The point is that if these more fundamental issues are not identified and rectified, the phenomena is always going to surface. The current proposal only tries to.mitigate the symptoms of a more severe problem (and is likely to be inefficient even at that, as your article points out).

    Posted by yuhuai | March 3, 2014, 9:44 am
    • It is peculiar, this Bill, and it feels like we’re rushing into legislation because other countries have done it / there are anecdotal instances of people being harassed or bullied. That’s the practical consideration. Pragmatically I’d be interested to hear how we intend to police misbehaviour on the Internet.

      Jin Yao

      Posted by guanyinmiao | March 3, 2014, 4:16 pm

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Pingback: Diverse Internet Cannot Be Dichotomised | guanyinmiao's musings - April 20, 2015

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow guanyinmiao's musings on WordPress.com

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,153 other followers

Twitter

%d bloggers like this: