you're reading...
Musings, The Straits Times

Why The People’s Association Is Stifling Its Own Progress Forward

The People’s Association (PA) has been an important component of the Singapore mechanism; with it being synonymous with an assortment of grassroots involvement and activities through its network of centres and volunteers. Its achievements on the ground – through the fifty years – cannot be denied: it has facilitated a host of community activities to foster integration and heighten understanding, offering assistance for less-privileged Singaporeans, encouraging a flurry of interest groups, programmes and courses that are diverse and attractive et cetera.

Grassroots activities – in terms of its outreach and strength – are especially significant for the development and maturity of a country in the various socio-economic spheres. Very naturally, the accessibility and proximity of these communal elements have subtly encouraged political parties across the globe to actively utilise these influences to their advantage. In the United States (USA) for instance, the Democrat and Republican parties maintain strong grassroots organisations to not only provide assistance to constituents whenever necessary, but also to increase advocacy efforts and rapidly spread political ideologies, or to garner ground support for a variety of policies and proposals.

However, such politicisation has deeply divided citizens and generated unnecessary tensions as a result of political differences, making enhanced bonding and the process of rendering much-needed help for individuals more arduous. In Singapore, the claim that the PA is political and not partisan is ludicrous, since the country has been predominantly a one-party state, with the Opposition kept out of this grassroots network. With the changing political landscape, and Singaporeans making more varied decisions at the voting booths, the PA needs to make a step forward to embrace internal administrative and advisory diversity. Continued close association with the ruling administration would continue to turn capable people away from the PA because of the fear of enforced beliefs.

For a positive start, appointed Opposition Members-of-Parliament (MP) who have won the mandate of their constituency should not be denied of their rightful advisory roles on the Citizen Consultative Committees (CCC). If they have to establish their own agencies to facilitate the aforementioned roles, the residents would only be at the losing end because of the bureaucracy and overlaps in the responsibilities of the two separate organs. Confusion and disillusionment would gradually set in. The MPs’ dedication to the betterment of their estates should not be in doubt, and they should be granted the deserved chance to prove their worth in enhancing the quality of life of their residents. Moving further, Nominated Members-of-Parliament (NMP) and Non-Constituency Members-of-Parliament (NCMP) should be more involved in the CCC and its respective components to heighten the combination of ideas and possibilities. PA’s antiquated notions of service must be gradually adjusted.

It is not just about being evergreen and changing personnel and leaders because it is the same script, different cast; with the fundamentals unchanged. Challenges such as the divides – of public and private residency and of new citizens – the purported superficiality of integration and the growing irrelevance of the “community” transcend petty political differences. While idealistic, PA’s eventual long-term success would be premised upon its detachment from any political influences, and subsequent ability to function as an independent body committed nobly and solely to the needs of all Singaporeans, regardless of race, language, religion – and political benefits.

About guanyinmiao

A man of knowledge lives by acting, not by thinking about acting. Carlos Castaneda.



  1. Pingback: Daily SG: 19 Jul 2010 « The Singapore Daily - July 19, 2010

  2. Pingback: Weekly Roundup: Week 30 « The Singapore Daily - July 24, 2010

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


  • RT @aktalkies: Entering 30s so tricky. Relationships are still fickle and nobody prepares you for the emotional toll of seeing parents grow… 16 hours ago
  • RT @AFPphoto: #Turkey - Mesut Hancer holds the hand of his 15-year-old daughter Irmak, who died in the earthquake in Kahramanmaras. 📷 @Adem16 hours ago
  • RT @IsabelleLimKopi: Huge news for Singaporeans living overseas who want to vote - a new law tabled in parliament today proposes postal vot… 2 days ago
  • RT @mjdutt: 6. Ironically, there is no performance management of the managers. There is no accountability. There are no metrics or evaluati… 3 days ago
  • RT @mjdutt: Thread Reflecting on Managing the Neoliberal University> 1. The neoliberal university is replete with a large-scale overload of… 3 days ago
%d bloggers like this: